Mileage Makes Them "HOT"

[Jack Meoff]

Just came back from a session at ***. Wont name her because that would just be plain rude. I actually went and made an appt with her because of the oh so very many positive reviews. I mean tonnes and tonnes of them.
In any event, yes the session was absolutely MIND BLOWING great (I kept my eyes shut for the entire time ), however I went with the presumption that the girl was gonna be a knockout. Absolutely postively NOT even remotely attractive. Very worn out looking.
So , I now understand that most positive reviews are due to mileage. Looks have f**K all to do with it. On that note, I promised myself to carry a brown paper bag in my trunk for future ventures.
With that being said, I have one question. Why are all of the MOST attactive MPAs lower mileage
I suppose most of it has to do with our nature, but (call me weird) I would prefer looks over risky mileage anyday.
Am I alone here?

$$$$$$$$

 

[CHRISTINE I]

This is a case of supply and demand. Hot women know they are in huge demand so they generally don't need to offer high mileage. Less-than-hot women offer more services in order to compete. I believe that this behaviour starts very young. Public school-aged girls who fit the popular definition of cute/pretty have boys fawning all over them, so they learn very quickly to take advantage of their looks. Thus it has always been and thus it will always be. Guys are way to easy to manipulate. Of course there are exceptions such as Sinful Selina (from what i have read) and these exceptional ladies are rewarded with gushing (pardon the pun) reviews and an extremely suprised/delighted clientelle. IMHO.

 

[White Delight is awesome!]

I'm not the biggest fan of extra high mileage, in fact i usually get scared of way too many extras especially if it's my first time with the mpa.Some extras though are always appreciated.
I usually prefer the hotter looking women who love to tease you more and always show you a lil preview of a lil bit more for the next time just to keep you hooked.

 

[Lust for Lola]

this is bullshit, what purpose does this board serve if you can't say who the bagless girl is.... I also like to go an see attractive ladies...

Mon$y why don't you post who it is otherwise you should have posted nothin.....

 

[Ashleigh P]

Are you implying that those of us who name MPA's in our reviews are rude ? Why even bother posting a review when you don't even mention the MP/MPA's name. A review is useless without that information. It's your fault you went in with such high expectations and came out disappointed in the looks department. It could very well be that those massageplanet.netites who have seen her find her atttractive, with the exception of you.

Most positive reviews are not due to mileage, but a variety of factors. It's stupid on your part to make that conclusion based on this one session. Just don't go see MPA's you don't find attractive .... why even bother carrying a brown paper bag !!!

 

[dan94adibi]

i think the guy was simply not naming the MPA because he didn't want to hurt her feelings by saying she's unattractive ... can't we all just get along?

 

[Automatic Avalanche]

I agree. It's not 'stupid' or 'bullshit' to show a little concern for someone's feelings. Some people could learn something from mon$y.

 

[Designer~Wife]

Batman, The Ladies Man,

As I stated her service was fine, so trust me no one will be wasting their time or money. I would never want this poor girl to ever read something so mean.

Why do I get the impression that many on here love to humiliate the MPAs. Is your life that bad, that you'd need to name an ugly MPA, to make yourself feel better???

This is a review board incase you forgot, and if her service were sub-par I would have no problem in naming her.

And back to my ORIGINAL POINT.

 

[shiva11]

2nd that opinion...I also have had a terrific session with a girl whose look could be described as less then "attractive"...however, everyone has different ideas on the subject of beauty, which is, of course, in the eye of the beholder...

 

[keld2682]

Mon$y:

I'm not sure if you could make that "inverse correlation" with regards to looks and mileage, and many massageplanet.netites, myself included, feel there's too much emphasis placed on mileage anyway...

I've had some fabulous sessions with girls who'd be considered both "lower mileage" and "average looking", but our personalities clicked and I had a damn good time...

That said, if you have a preference for the 20 year old bombshells, there's plenty of them out there, so have fun

 

[?V??us?]

of all the senses we use, eyesight is the most important. If who you are with is not attractive you have to use your imagination to forget what they look like.

If there are unpleasant odors, this could be a turn off too, but if they look great maybe can be ignored.

If skin is rough, unshaven, highly unlikely in this business I would think, if they are attractive you could probably ignore that too.

If they have a shrill voice, or sound like your mother, sister or SO, you could probably ignore that too.

Taste, well, of all the senses, if you have an attractive, pleasant smelling, smooth skinned, melodic diva on your hands or tongue, you probably have good taste too.

I of the beholder.

 

[TheDoctor]

Just like life outside of Mp business, i choose a girl initially for her looks then anything else(And if she is not my type then regardless of how many amazing reviews she has gotten i usually never choose her.The service is something which keeps me hooked and that doesn't neccessarily mean high mileage.
Imho it's a combination of good looks,hygeine,personality,CHEMISTRY,Body,Some mileage offcourse are a few things which keeps coming back to a particular Mpa.

 

[bluebonnetgranny]

Yep.

I can think of a couple of times I found myself in a room with a girl I found very unattractive b/c of rave reviews and not having a chance to get a peek prior to the shower (someone showed me into the room, etc.). Fuck I hate it when that happens! I'm dying to get out of there, and she's trying to stick her smelly tongue down my throat! And than I have to pay! (A few years back I actually couldn't take it with a studio-B girl that was discussed on here like the holly grail. This girl had a big, big smelly ass and tried to sit on my face. I RAN!)

Using your math Paul; 20% of all girls that get rave reviews are both drop dead gorgeous and willing to go the distance. It's probably less. However, there are many that aren't discussed on here that are gorgeous and do go the distance. Those are the True Gems!

kkarn/

 

[Smokie Bear]

I guess this answers the original question... Paul sees the industry more from a "30,000 foot" view than the rest of us...

 

[Suzanne L]

Maybe I'm just young and naive

 

[PUNTER]

Milage definitly counts... but it's not everything!!!

 

[Cherryblossum]

Mileage is all that matters.

Close your eyes and enjoy.


By the way, is that the infamous Batman in action on massageplanet.net now... Thought his stint at GTAC would have kept him from the using the same name.

 

[westo]

There is some truth to this; I think we like to maintain that we have a certain standard which reflects on us and attempt to elevate our projected/self image by degrading/judging others.

I must be missing something here; I don't see why a negative experience, as well as you being dissapointed in her looks, would make it OK to name her ?

Apparently the intent of your post was to address the issue of mileage in relation to looks, rather than an actual review, so I don't see why you should be expected to name the MPA in question.

I have to respect your intentions in not naming her, but I don't see how you can conclude that she is ,"absolutely positively NOT even remotely attractive" or, as you put it later, "ugly". It would be more accurate to say, she isn't your type or you don't find her attractive and/or, even, that you couldn't understand how the majority of people would see her as attractive based purely on looks.

There are certain "looks" that have an almost universal appeal, but even then, those certain "types" of looks generally are only appreciated by a percentage group of guys and not all. Many times, I don't find certain chicks attractive, but generally I can see why others do, and at other times am somewhat bemused.

For me personally, when I select an MPA to see, they must be hot upon initial impressions/perception and then fun factor comes into play - both must be present to a large degree. However, that initial impression of physical looks can either be enhanced or detracted from due to manner, personality, sensuality and to a degree actual [so called] mileage. Although, It has happened both in the "tour guide" world and [so called] civilian world where physical attraction isn't always immediately apparent and it has little or nothing to do with mileage.

I'm not so sure that saying most attractive MPA's are lower mileage is actually true. In my experience, almost all the hot MPAs I've seen are a lotta fun. Actually, the only exceptions I can think of, off hand, are Cameron, as I saw her in her final years ( may she RIP ), and Tia@IT.

However, it does seem to be true that some tourists are less superficial than I, and do, to varying degrees, value service highly in correlation to looks.

I'm having a hard time imagining who the MPA you are referring to might be, because there are virtually no MPAs, in the more well known MPs, that wouldn't rank in the upper rungs of the overall "universal" attractiveness scale.

PS yeah, I'm bored again.